Skip to main content
Taggora

Real scans, not a hypothetical.

Actual results from small public-entity sites we scanned — the names removed and the recorded results preserved. These are individual examples, not a representative survey.

These historical snapshots describe the pages and PDFs sampled at the time of each scan, not the sites' current condition. Scan dates and scoring versions are not available with these examples, so the scores should not be compared directly with a new scan. Automated screening does not establish WCAG conformance.

A cemetery district

61/ 100
accessibility score

Two hundred and eight PDFs — agendas, minutes, budget reports going back years. We're capped at analyzing 20 per scan, and 13 of those had no tagging for screen readers at all.

  • Pages checked27
  • PDFs found208
  • Untagged (of 20 analyzed)13
8 critical89 serious

A fire protection district

42/ 100
accessibility score

Nineteen of the 20 PDFs we checked were untagged. That finding describes the analyzed sample, not every PDF on the site.

  • Pages checked30
  • PDFs found141
  • Untagged (of 20 analyzed)19
5 critical200 serious25 moderate

We hold our own site to the same bar we're asking yours to meet — this one we're happy to show by name.

iCityWork.com

100/ 100
accessibility score

No automated issues were detected in this sample of six pages and one PDF. A score of 100 does not establish WCAG conformance; manual review is still needed.

Download the real report (PDF)
  • Pages checked6
  • PDFs found1
  • Untagged0
0 automated issues detected

Curious what your own site looks like?

Scan your site